Company & Service Information
Identify the service provider and determine if the EAA applies to your organization.
Evaluation based on WCAG 2.1 Level AA criteria
This report evaluates your website criterion by criterion against WCAG 2.1 Level AA, the technical standard referenced by EN 301 549 and required by Directive (EU) 2019/882. Each question maps to an official numbered criterion. Your report includes: scoring by principle, country-specific legal risk analysis, and a developer fix checklist. 8-20 hours of work done in 15 minutes.
The EAA applies to all e-commerce services, banking, telecom, transport, audiovisual, and e-book services provided to EU consumers. Microenterprises (fewer than 10 employees AND whose annual turnover OR balance sheet total does not exceed €2M) providing services are exempt (Art. 4(5), Directive 2019/882).
This email will appear in your Accessibility Statement as the contact point for users to report accessibility issues (Art. 13 EAA).
Name or role of the person handling accessibility feedback (recommended).
The date this evaluation was conducted. Your Accessibility Statement must include this date.
WCAG Evaluation: Perceivable & Operable
Evaluate your website against the core accessibility criteria referenced by EN 301 549 (the harmonised standard for EAA compliance). Answer honestly — your responses will shape your compliance report.
👁 Principle 1: Perceivable
Information and user interface components must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive (Recital 47, Directive 2019/882).
Do all images on your website have descriptive alternative text (alt text)?WCAG 1.1.1 — Non-text Content
Do videos have captions or subtitles?WCAG 1.2.2 — Captions (Prerecorded)
Is there sufficient colour contrast between text and background (at least 4.5:1)?WCAG 1.4.3 — Contrast (Minimum)
Can users resize text up to 200% without loss of content or functionality?WCAG 1.4.4 — Resize Text
Is information conveyed by more than just colour alone (e.g., icons, labels, patterns)?WCAG 1.4.1 — Use of Colour
⌨ Principle 2: Operable
User interface components and navigation must be operable by all users, including those who cannot use a mouse (Recital 47, Directive 2019/882).
Can all interactive elements (links, buttons, forms) be accessed using only a keyboard?WCAG 2.1.1 — Keyboard
Is there no "keyboard trap" (user can navigate away from any element)?WCAG 2.1.2 — No Keyboard Trap
Does no content flash more than 3 times per second?WCAG 2.3.1 — Three Flashes
Can users skip repetitive navigation blocks (e.g., "Skip to content" link)?WCAG 2.4.1 — Bypass Blocks
Do all pages have unique, descriptive titles?WCAG 2.4.2 — Page Titled
WCAG Evaluation: Understandable & Robust
Continue evaluating your website against the remaining WCAG 2.1 AA principles.
📖 Principle 3: Understandable
Information and the operation of the user interface must be understandable (Recital 47, Directive 2019/882).
Is the default language of the page declared in the HTML (lang attribute)?WCAG 3.1.1 — Language of Page
Are all form fields clearly labelled with visible text labels?WCAG 3.3.2 — Labels or Instructions
Are error messages clear, specific, and suggest how to fix the problem?WCAG 3.3.1 — Error Identification
Is navigation consistent across all pages of the website?WCAG 3.2.3 — Consistent Navigation
⚙ Principle 4: Robust
Content must be robust enough that it can be interpreted reliably by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies (Recital 47, Directive 2019/882).
Is the HTML well-structured and semantic (proper use of headings, lists, landmarks)?WCAG 4.1.1 — Parsing
Do all interactive components (buttons, forms, menus) have accessible names and roles?WCAG 4.1.2 — Name, Role, Value
Are status messages (e.g., "Item added to cart") communicated to screen readers?WCAG 4.1.3 — Status Messages
Non-Accessible Content & Feedback Mechanism
Document known accessibility gaps (Annex V, Directive 2019/882) and confirm your feedback channel for users.
⚠ Known Accessibility Gaps
Under Annex V and Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1523, your Accessibility Statement must list all known non-accessible content, categorised by reason: non-compliance with requirements, disproportionate burden (Art. 14), or third-party content outside your control.
📬 Feedback Mechanism
Art. 13 of the EAA requires service providers to have a procedure for users to report accessibility problems. Your contact details will appear in the Accessibility Statement and the HTML code block for your website footer.
How was this accessibility evaluation conducted?
Your EAA Accessibility Compliance Report
Based on your evaluation, here is your conformity status and risk exposure.
Conformity Status
⚠ Legal Risk Exposure —
📋 Issues Found
A consultant charges €500-2,000 · A SaaS costs €200-500/month · Free tools give you a generic paragraph
Your Complete EAA Compliance Package
€99
One-time payment per website · No subscription · Ready in minutes
- 6-page PDF Compliance Report — professional draft you can use directly or adapt
- Personalised Accessibility Statement ready to publish on your website
- HTML code block for your footer (copy-paste, done)
- Criterion-by-criterion evaluation with YOUR specific issues identified
- Developer action checklist — send it to your developer, they fix it
- Country-specific fine ranges (sourced from national law for DE, ES, FR, IT, NL + indicative for all EU)
- Disproportionate burden documentation template
8-20 hours of research → 15 minutes. That is what you are paying for.
Document generated from data provided by the service provider, under their sole responsibility, pursuant to Art. 13(2) of Directive (EU) 2019/882. Professional draft that the company can use directly or adapt to its needs. Data processed 100% in your browser in compliance with the data minimisation principle of the GDPR (Regulation EU 2016/679). No data is transmitted to any server.
Generated with EAA-Report · eaa-report.com · SolidwareTools · hello@solidwaretools.com
Generated with EAA-Report · eaa-report.com · SolidwareTools · hello@solidwaretools.com